according to the jacobson version (yup there are many versions out there), jack as the portrayed protagonist had already butchered the giant - according to wiki, in a murderous rage - before he proceeded back to earth and chopped down the bean stalk.
all good criminals must know how to cover his tracks right? so theoretically the bringing down of the bean stalk should completely banished all the tracks leading jack to the murder and robbery as no one could reach the scene of the crime, ever.
but (as always) there's a flaw. his hands had been stained badly by the giant's blood and unfortunately for him the blood couldn't be washed away because of this weird chemical in it. lucky for jack that didn't matter much as people were maniacally enthralled by his mountains of gold and by that time had already been blinded by their brightness to question, let alone notice jack's red hands.
and as you already know, like the rest of 'em fairy tales 'prince charming', he lived happily ever after. which only means that he was never convicted of the heinous crime. happy ending indeed.
all good criminals must know how to cover his tracks right? so theoretically the bringing down of the bean stalk should completely banished all the tracks leading jack to the murder and robbery as no one could reach the scene of the crime, ever.
but (as always) there's a flaw. his hands had been stained badly by the giant's blood and unfortunately for him the blood couldn't be washed away because of this weird chemical in it. lucky for jack that didn't matter much as people were maniacally enthralled by his mountains of gold and by that time had already been blinded by their brightness to question, let alone notice jack's red hands.
and as you already know, like the rest of 'em fairy tales 'prince charming', he lived happily ever after. which only means that he was never convicted of the heinous crime. happy ending indeed.
10 comments:
kau suka buku ?
yup, bleh tahanla. knpkah soalan yg agak aneh ini? hehe
sebab kau mentioned 'Catch-22' di page aku.
melainkan orang yang suka buku, tak akan ada yang mahu mention perkara sedemikian..
owh. aku sgt suka buku tu
tula satu2 nya buku yg pnh aku baca yg bleh buat aku gelak smpai kua air mata hehe
oh. mungkin kerana ini buku tentang bureaucracy jadah segala, pasal army ke bombardier lagi [kan?].
jadi , biasa-biasa saja pada aku.
bukan minat aku kot..
hehe tadehal. pe kata pepatah tu, lain padang, lain belalang?
ha, betul la tu.
sesekali baca genre lain tak mendatangkan mudarat pun...
yap, setuju seratus persen
haduss..bes 2,tnggal ape je yg aku ley bacekan utk bedtime story ank aku nnt? tinggal kisah kncil ngn boye je la opsyennye. yg ni sadis sket xpe kot. nama pn hukum rimba.tp stakat ni xde ag la yg mati..8D
haha bleh je kot nk cite.just jgn cite yg sbnrnya la.nama pn fairy tale kan, bndanya bkn statik bkn takleh nk ubah. lainla fakta sejarah, n even tu pun org tukar jgk
Post a Comment